 Print
A call to terminate the the United nations
7-23-2025
The United Nations: A Monument to Hypocrisy
The United Nations is not a neutral force. It is not a beacon of peace, and it is certainly not a protector of human rights—at least not when it comes to Muslims.
What it is… is a polished front for the world’s selective morality. A stage where global powers perform their compassion while Muslim blood seeps into the soil, unseen, unacknowledged, and unavenged.
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1995: Where thousands of Bosnian Muslims were systematically executed, by Serbian militia in a so-called “safe zone” under UN protection. UN peacekeepers, unarmed and powerless, in one event had literally handed over nine thousands Muslim civilians to Ratko Mladic, the butcher of Bosnia.
The UN secretary Boutros Ghali— A Coptic Egyptian diplomat who publicly delayed action and formed an arm embargo that left the Muslims without means of self-defence, for almost four years Muslims were being slaughtered. His legacy is stained.
Somalia, 1993: UNOSOM II, led by General Jonathan Morehouse, gave cover to U.S.-led attacks that targeted civilian infrastructure. In July 1993, UN helicopters opened fire on a hospital in Mogadishu, killing scores of innocent Somalis. Under the pretence of neutral peacekeeping, the UN turned into an occupying force, punishing the people for standing behind Mohamed Farrah Aidid, a leader who dared to defy foreign domination and stood up to the Americans.
Rwanda, 1994: Over eight hundred thousand people, including Muslim communities in Bugesera and elsewhere, were slaughtered in one hundred days. General Roméo Dallaire begged for UN reinforcements, warning of genocide. Kofi Annan, head of UN peacekeeping at the time, ignored the calls. The UN not only failed to prevent genocide—it reduced its forces while the killing began.
Syria, 2011: Over half a million dead, four millions displaced. Children choked by gas. Families buried under rubble. Russia vetoed UN Security Council action over seventeen times, while the rest of the world debated. Barrel bombs and chemical attacks were met with statements, not solutions. Entire cities like Aleppo and Ghouta were crushed as the UN stood by.
Iraq, 1990–2003: Over a decade of UN-imposed sanctions led to the death of more than five hundred thousand children. Former UN officials like Denis Halliday and Hans von resigned in protest, calling the sanctions genocidal. When asked if it was worth it, Madeleine Albright said plainly, “We think the price is worth it.”
And then there's Palestine—seventy-five years of occupation. The ethnic cleansing of al-Nakba in 1948, where seven hundred fifty thousand Palestinians were driven from their homes. Entire villages erased. And what did the UN do? It passed Resolution 194, calling for the right of return. That resolution has been ignored for three quarters of a century, collecting dust on UN shelves .
More than one hundred ninety UN resolutions have been passed regarding Israeli violations—every single one has been ignored or vetoed. The UN has sent more peacekeepers to protect warlords than to shield Palestinian children from sniper fire.
This hypocrisy didn’t start yesterday. It was baked into the foundation.
Before the new name called UN, It was the League of Nations—the same monster in a different suit. After World War I, the Muslim world was divided by the Sykes-Picot Agreement, as Britain and France carved up lands under the fake label of “mandates.” The League handed over Muslim lands to colonial powers, and called it “international order.”
France occupied Algeria from 1830 to 1962, murdering over six million people. They banned the Quran, banned the hijab, and tortured civilians in mass detention camps. In Syria, France crushed the 1925–1927 Great Syrian Revolt with airstrikes on civilians. In Morocco, Spain used chemical weapons during the Rif War in the 1920s, bombing entire villages and killing thousands. These were not rogue acts—these were coordinated, state-sponsored, colonial massacres. Not only did the League of Nations stay silent, but its very structure gave these empires legitimacy.
When the UN replaced the League in 1945, nothing changed. It gave the colonial system more power, five members states with vetoes, sitting at the top of the Security Council. They decide who lives. They decide who gets justice. The rest of the world watches.
Let’s call it what it is.This isn’t just a pattern of failure. It’s a deliberate system of global control, dressed in diplomacy. The UN doesn’t protect the weak. It protects the powerful. It’s not about human rights. It’s about maintaining the world order. Their world. Their rules.
When Muslims are bombed, the UN drafts resolutions. When Muslims resist, it drafts condemnations.
So we must ask: What was the purpose of the United Nations? What was the reason behind its creation—Is it not to divide weaker nations, cement the rule of the few over the many, and give global empires a legal shield to dominate and supersede?
It was never made to save us.
It was made to silence us.
And the time for silence is over, We must call for the termination of this vile organization or at least, Muslim nations should stop been a member of it as Allah tala instructed us ( ???????? ??? ???? ? ?????? – And unite together on righteousness and kindness)
Footnotes:
|